The burden of proof

This column first appeared in the Salmon Arm All Month Edition of the Friday Am in November 2013

Is it me or is the burden of proof especially heavy these days? I am gobsmacked at the sheer expense incurred by unearthing the truth behind the Senate and Ford scandal. Not that I’m not also gobsmacked by the scandals themselves, but the cost associated to both is what really leaves me reeling.

If I understand this correctly, we (and by we I mean you and I and everyone who pays taxes) have spent, on three senators alone, $500,000 in auditing fees. Which, if you follow my logic, means we’ve spent more money on checking into the problem than the actual problem cost in the first place. Now, again, it might just be me, but if my car repair cost me more than its total original cost, I probably wouldn’t have that car anymore. It would have promptly been picked up by the tow truck and sent to the wreckers.

We’ll likely never know how much money the citizens of Toronto have paid their municipal police force to unearth the alleged video of the alleged crack pipe smoking. I’m pretty comfortable alleging that it would be more money than anyone would ever put in any pipe and smoke.

On the other hand, we have the corruption inquiry in Quebec. We’ll probably never really know how much the inquiry will have cost the economy of Quebec and, in this case, it likely pales in comparison to what the bribes amounted to in the first place, but there again, the burden of proof, rather than the infractions themselves, has hijacked the headlines.

Perhaps it’s the drama that enthralls us. An episode of Coronation Street on steroids paid for by taxpayers. Who said what, who did what, who spent what, who hid what, who got what. Aren’t we really missing the point? The opportunity to repair, redress, correct, improve and move on. I think so.

We spend so much of our lives explaining, apologizing, justifying, projecting and blaming. It’s ridiculous. And we’ve no one to blame but ourselves. We elected them. And we keep electing them. What’s more, we give them permission to use their mandates as opportunities to get re-elected. Consider Harper’s speech at the recent Conservative convention. He wasn’t speaking to the problem, he was making the case for his next majority, complete with thundersticks, no less. Listen to Rob Ford’s radio broadcast apology. He turned it into a campaign speech. Tricky that. But he did it and his approval ratings are up.

When the late Edward Kennedy, one of the longest serving and most respected politicians of our time famously said “The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dream shall never die”, he was talking about leadership, not election campaigns. Our politicians would do well to remember this. If you win, and good for you if you do, then lead. And keep the campaigning to the painful number of days of rhetoric we endure every election period.

When you make a mistake, admit it, redress it and get back to work. It’s enough that we have to pay for the mistakes in the first place. Please don’t make us pay for the rest. The burden, it seems to me, is too costly to bear. Unless, that is, you think we have money to burn.
Advertisements

One Response

  1. […] out the full version of Louise’s latest – The burden of proof – (Blahgg Blog : Nov. 8 […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: